Legal Opinion

Illinois Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 20, 1981No. 16905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Londrigan

Aircall Communications, Inc. (Aircall), sought a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission). Aircall proposed to conduct both tone-only and tone-and-voice radio paging operations in the Charleston-Mattoon area of Illinois. Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company (Illinois Consolidated), who was already operating a paging service in this area, was allowed to intervene. The Commission granted Aircall a certificate. Illinois Consolidated’s request for a rehearing was denied. Illinois Consolidated then appealed the cause to the circuit court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Michelson v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Illinois-Indiana Cable Television Ass'n v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Talandis Construction Corp. v. Illinois Building AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Lambdin v. Commerce Commission Ex Rel. Assumption Mutual Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Radio Relay Corp. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Illinois Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sheffler v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Illinois Consolidated Telephone Co. v. Aircall Communications, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Sheffler v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API