Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Conservation Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 16, 2011No. SC 18426PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether General Statutes § 22a-40 (a) (l)1 and § 4.1 (a) of the inland wetlands and watercourses regulations (regulations) of the town of Fairfield (town),2 allow as *62of right, that is, without the approval of a local wetlands authority, the filling of wetlands to construct roads. The plaintiff, James Taylor, appeals3 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his administrative appeal from the decision of the defendant, the town conservation commission (commission), acting in its capacity as the inland wetlands and watercourses…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Wood v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Rapoport v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS STAMFORDSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Indian Land Co. v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API