Legal Opinion
Triangle Refineries, Inc. v. Brua
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 26, 1985No. C2-84-1143PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Appellant Triangle Refineries, Inc. appeals from the trial court’s order dated May 16, 1984, granting respondent Roger Brua’s motion for a discharge and satisfaction of record of Triangle’s judgment pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 548.18 (1982). We affirm as modified.
FACTS
On April 27, 1982, a judgment, pursuant to a confession of judgment signed by Brua, was entered in favor of Triangle in the amount of $19,310.41 for products sold in November and December 1981. Triangle’s judgment was docketed in Freeborn county on April 27, 1982, thus creating “a lien, in the amount…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wallace T. Bruce, Inc. v. NajarianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Ducker v. Standard Supply Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- H. E. Westerman Lumber Co. v. RaschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Albritton v. General Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Olsen v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hentges v. P.H. Feely & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Conklin v. Iowa District Court for Scott CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- In Re FischerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Bank of Oklahoma v. AshleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009