Legal Opinion

Harry Duchesne v. Wylie L. Williams, Jr., and the City of Inkster, a Municipal Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1988No. 86-1017Published

1Opinion of the Court

849 F.2d 1004

57 USLW 2002, 3 Indiv.Empl.Rts.Cas. 715

Harry DUCHESNE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Wylie L. WILLIAMS, Jr., and the City of Inkster, a municipal

corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 86-1017.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Reargued March 30, 1988.

Decided June 20, 1988.

Rehearing Denied July 22, 1988.

Marilyn Madorsky (argued), Provizer, Eisenberg, Lichtenstein & Pearlman, P.C., Southfield, Mich., for defendants-appellants.

Susan E. Morrison (argued), Bloomfield Hills, Mich., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before ENGEL, Chief Judge*, LIVELY, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Wellford; Concurrence · Nelson.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API