Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Murane v. Jack
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1937No. 2038PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Riner, Justice.
This case arises as an original proceeding in this court, speaking generally, in consequence of a disagreement between the defendant, Wm. “Scotty” Jack as State Auditor of the State of Wyoming, and the plaintiff, C. D. Murane, one of the District Judges of this commonwealth, concerning the proper interpretation of Chapter 66, Laws of Wyoming, 1933, which amended and re-enacted Section 30-114 W. R. S., 1931, prescribing the mileage expense to be paid state, county or precinct officers in Wyoming.
By this petition for a writ of mandamus the plaintiff has presented five alleged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- Taxpayers' League of Carbon County v. McPhersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Kingen v. KelleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1891
- Houghton Bros. v. YocumWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SternWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Morrison-Kudson Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Sanches v. SanchesWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Ward v. YoderWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
- Oroz v. HayesWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.