Legal Opinion
Otto v. Harllee
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
Plaintiff in error was relator in the court below and instituted mandamus proceedings to coerce the Board of County Commissioners to refund to him an amount equal to the proportion of the county and district tax embraced in a certain tax certificate of which he was the lawful owner when the same was cancelled by the Comptroller under the provisions of Section 783 R. G. S., 1009 C. G. L., it being alleged that the tax certificate was void because the description contained therein, to wit: “Lot bounded N by Manatee River, E by Main St. S. by a street, W by Spring Street, Sec. 25, Twp. 34 S.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thursby v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Walls v. EndelSupreme Court of Florida · 1883
- People ex rel. Kern v. ChaseIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- State Ex Rel. Melbourne State Bank v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- State ex rel. Standaed Oil Co. v. BlaisdellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- STATE, DEPT. OF ADMINSTRATION v. StevensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Chester C. Fosgate Co. v. KirklandDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1937
- State, Department of Administration, Division of Personnel v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Administrative HearingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Palbicke v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Northern Investment Corp. v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.