Legal Opinion
Lautzenheiser v. Jolly Bar & Grille, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 23, 1994No. Docket 158533PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:.
Plaintiffs appeal by leave granted an order of the circuit court dismissing their suit against defendant Jolly Bar & Grille, Inc. (hereinafter defendant) for failure to fulfill the 120-day notice requirement in the dramshop act. We affirm.
MCL 436.22(5); MSA 18.993(5) provides in relevant part:
An action under this section shall be instituted within 2 years after the injury or death. A plaintiff seeking damages under this section shall give written notice to all defendants within 120 days after entering an attorney-client relationship for the purpose of pursuing a claim under this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brown v. Jojo-Ab, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. SeilsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Chambers v. Midland Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Langrill v. Stingers LoungeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Turnley v. Rocky’s Teakwood Lounge, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- David Sanders v. Shawn SpohnMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.