Sanchez v. City of Santa Ana
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER Re: PLAINTIFFS’ DISPARATE IMPACT CLAIMS
KENYON, District Judge.
Based on the bench trial of July 18-27, 1995 and the papers submitted, the Court ISSUES the following Order on Plaintiffs’ disparate impact claims. 1 The Court ORDERS defendant the City of Santa Ana to file and serve its Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and a Proposed Judgment in accordance with this Order within fourteen days from the issuance of this Order.
I. BACKGROUND
On remand from the Ninth Circuit, the following claims were tried before this Court: Plaintiffs Sanchez’s and Torres’s claims against…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Prieto v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- (PS) Houhoulas v. CalTrans HRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023