Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. City of Santa Ana

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 22, 1995No. CV 79-1818 KNPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER Re: PLAINTIFFS’ DISPARATE IMPACT CLAIMS

KENYON, District Judge.

Based on the bench trial of July 18-27, 1995 and the papers submitted, the Court ISSUES the following Order on Plaintiffs’ disparate impact claims. 1 The Court ORDERS defendant the City of Santa Ana to file and serve its Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and a Proposed Judgment in accordance with this Order within fourteen days from the issuance of this Order.

I. BACKGROUND

On remand from the Ninth Circuit, the following claims were tried before this Court: Plaintiffs Sanchez’s and Torres’s claims against…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Prieto v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
  2. (PS) Houhoulas v. CalTrans HRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API