Legal Opinion
Pope v. Elabo GmbH
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 4, 2008No. 06-CV-0516(PJS/JJG)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
Defendant/third-party plaintiff Elabo GmbH (“Elabo”) moves for summary judgment on the basis that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over it. For the reasons that follow, the Court construes Ela-bo’s motion as one to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and denies the motion.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Elabo is a manufacturer of sophisticated testing equipment. Elabo is based in Crailsheim, Germany; the company does not maintain a place of business in the United States, does not own any real or personal property in the United States,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Fabara v. Gofit, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Westley v. MannDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Yellow Brick Road, LLC v. ChildsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Foreign Candy Co. v. Tropical Paradise, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
- Leduc Gifts & Specialty Prods., LLC v. New Thermo-Serv, Ltd.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.