Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n

We granted leave to consider several questions presented, beginning with whether the trial court properly granted plaintiff’s motion for summary disposition regarding whether any personal injury protection benefits to which plaintiff may have been entitled were *64overdue. We would hold the following: The trial court correctly granted plaintiff’s motion; the no-fault act does not preclude an insurer from disputing the validity of a personal protection injury claim; the Court of Appeals properly held that plaintiff was entitled to interest under MCL 500.3142(3); MSA 24.13142(3); the trial court…