Fletcher v. Ford Motor Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGribbs, J.
The plaintiff, Ruby Fletcher, appeals from a judgment for the defendant, Ford Motor Company, in a products liability action. Fletcher worked for the Budd Company, which produced automobile parts for Ford. The dies to produce the parts were supplied by Ford and did not include protective guards to prevent a press operator’s hands from being crushed between the dies. Fletcher was using a press which required two-hand operation. Theoretically, if one hand was removed from a palm button, the press ram would stop. Fletcher reached into the die space to remove a part which had failed to properly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coger v. MacKinaw Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Dunn v. Lederle LaboratoriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- McComish v. DeSoiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Fredericks v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Thompson v. Essex Wire Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Castellani, R., Aplts. v. Scranton TimesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Hilgendorf v. St. John Hosp. and Medical Center Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Aldridge v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Francisco v. Manson, Jackson & Kane, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Castellani, R., Aplts. v. Scranton TimesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015