Near v. Donnelly
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Submitted on briefs October 13, 1892. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 80 Mich. 130.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff and several other residents of Mason paid into the defendant's hands sums of money aggregating $2,500 for the purpose of aiding in the building of an hotel, under an agreement fully set out in Near v. Donnelly, 80 Mich. 132. The plaintiff's subscription amounted to $500. The defendant, in consideration of this subscription, agreed to build the hotel, and on its completion to furnish and keep the same as an hotel, and to pay to each of the subscribers 7 per cent, per annum upon the amount invested by each as long as they should continue to own the same.
This action was brought to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bassey and Selesko, PC v. CondonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- Murray v. NearMichigan Supreme Court · 1895