Legal Opinion

Maidment v. Russell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The plaintiff, J. W. Maidment, a judgment creditor of the defendant, Ed Russell, has appealed from a decree of the circuit court dismissing a suit brought to set aside certain transfers of real and personal property, from the said Ed Russell to his mother, the defendant, Kate Russell, which are alleged to have been made to defraud creditors.

The indebtedness which ripened into plaintiff’s judgment on August 15, 1933, was for money loaned to the defendant, Ed Russell, and was evidenced by a promissory note executed by the said defendant to the plaintiff under date of October 29, 1929, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ball v. DantonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Coffey v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Connel v. O'ConnorOregon Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Page v. Thomas Kay Woolen Mill Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Nelson v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Boone v. BurdenOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Maidment v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API