Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. United States Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2013No. 12-3087PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs are thirty-eight individuals and entities who farm corn and soybeans in several counties' in Iowa (collectively, the “Producers”). Each Producer claimed eligibility to receive a payment under the Supplemental Revenue Assistance Payments Program (“SURE Program”) for the 2008 crop year. In this lawsuit, the Producers allege that the defendants, six government entities and officials, improperly calculated SURE program payments allegedly owed to them under 7 U.S.C. § 1531. The .district court 2 dismissed the lawsuit because the Producers failed to exhaust their…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Zutz v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pamela Green v. Charles ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. STABL, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  3. Raymond v. Board of Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  4. Cowpasture River Preservation v. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  5. Robert Bruning v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API