Legal Opinion
Kelsoe v. Kelsoe
Essex County Circuit Court
Decided July 16, 2003No. Case No. CH96001943Published
1Opinion of the Court
By Judge Harry T. Taliaferro, III
The parties by leave of court filed in December 2002, a Second Amended Answer and Cross-Bill and an Answer to Second Amended Cross-Bill. These amended pleadings were filed during the pendency of Ms. Kelsoe’s Plea in Bar and Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 2:21.
Rule 2:21 states as follows: *424Ms. Kelsoe seeks dismissal of Mr. Kelsoe’s Second Amended Cross-Bill filed December 17, 2002. The purpose of this letter is to rule on such Plea and Motion.
*423Except in a suit for divorce or for the annulment of marriage, either party may make a motion for summary…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Grady Allen v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Lowery v. StovallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Ted Lansing Supply Co. v. Royal Aluminum & Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.