Legal Opinion

Louis Levien Cut Glass Co. v. Hinsberger

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from City Court of New York; Special Term.. Action by the Louis Levien Cut Glass Company against Louis Hinsberger. From an order resettling an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside a verdict for plaintiff and for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

Upon the trial the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff, awarding the plaintiff $1,356.72 on its first cause of action, and allowing the defendant $500 upon the counterclaim. The defendant moved to set aside the verdict directed, and for a new trial, under section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure. This motion was denied, and an order duly entered thereon. A copy of this order, with notice of entry thereof, was served on the attorney for defendant on November 1, 1913. No appeal was taken from that order. On November 18, 1913, after the time of the defendant to appeal from the order had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stierle v. Union Railway Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Louis Levien Cut Glass Co. v. HinsbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API