Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Donaldson v. Alfred

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1993No. Nos. 91-1760 and 91-2247Published

1Dissent

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.,

dissenting. A typical funding order directs the funding authority to pay only specified expenses incurred or to be incurred by the court, such as the appropriation of funds for an annual and detailed line-item budget or the payment of specified supplies, equipment, additional personnel, or salary increases. See, e.g., State ex rel. Weaver v. Lake Cty. Bd of Commrs. (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 204, 580 N.E.2d 1090; In re Furnishings for Courtroom Two (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 427, 20 O.O.3d 367, 423 N.E.2d 86; State ex rel. O'Farrell v. New Philadelphia City Council (1991),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Weaver v. Lake County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In re Furnishings & Equipment for the Judge, Courtroom & Personnel for Courtroom TwoOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. O'Farrell v. New Philadelphia City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API