Legal Opinion
Board of Education of Oak Park & River Forest High School District No. 200 v. Kelly E. ex rel. Nancy E.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 24, 2000No. Nos. 99-1589, 00-1361PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Does the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-87, entitle a local school district to reimbursement from the state for some or all of the expense when the district must reimburse parents for a child’s private education? A court may direct a school district to pay for private education “if the court ultimately determines that such placement, rather than a proposed iep [individualized education program], is proper under the Act.” Burlington School Committee v. Massachusetts Department of Education, 471 U.S. 359, 369, 105 S.Ct. 1996, 85 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Board of Education of the Poughkeepsie City School District v. O'SheaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Maroni Ex Rel. Michael M. v. Pemi-Baker Regional School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- B.G. ex rel. J.A.G. v. City of Chicago School District 299District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Board of Education of Oak Park and River Forest High School District No. 200 v. Kelly E., by Her Parent and Next Friend Nancy E., and Illinois State Board of Education, T.H., a Minor, and L.H. And S.H., Individually and as Next Friends of T.H. v. Board of Education of Palatine Community Consolidated School District No. 15 v. Illinois State Board of Education and Glenn McGee Superintendent of Education, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and MCI Metro Access Transmission Services, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, and United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors-Appellees v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Doing Business as Ameritech Illinois, Incorporated, and Illinois Commerce Commission, Terry Harvill, Ruth K. Kretschmer, in Their Official Capacities as Commissioners of the Illinois Commerce Commission and Not as Individuals, Wisconsin Bell, Incorporated, Doing Business as Ameritech Wisconsin v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Cheryl L. Parrino, in Her Official Capacity as a Member of the Commission, Daniel J. Eastman, in His Official Capacity as a Member of the Commission, Wisconsin Bell, Incorporated, Doing Business as Ameritech Wisconsin v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Cheryl L. Parrino and Joseph P. Mettner, Commissioners of the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Bell, Incorporated, Doing Business as Ameritech Wisconsin v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Cheryl L. Parrino, Daniel J. Eastman, MCI Metro Access Transmission Services, Incorporated, and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Cheryl L. Parrino, Daniel J. Eastman, in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Commission, Wisconsin Bell, Incorporated, Doing Business as Ameritech Wisconsin v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Cheryl L. Parrino, Daniel J. Eastman, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.