Hart & Schlessenger Corp. v. Mullen
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to District Court of Gilpin County. This was a suit to enforce a lien, under the statute by the plaintiff in error, for materials furnished Neaman (impleaded with Mullen and Sartori), and used by Neaman in the construction of a building owned by him. Upon demurrer, the petition was dismissed as to Mullen and Sartori. Default was taken against Neaman.
Read the full summary
Error to District Court of Gilpin County. This was a suit to enforce a lien, under the statute by the plaintiff in error, for materials furnished Neaman (impleaded with Mullen and Sartori), and used by Neaman in the construction of a building owned by him. Upon demurrer, the petition was dismissed as to Mullen and Sartori. Default was taken against Neaman. From the. evidence taken before the master, it appears that Neaman was the owner of the building at the time the materials were furnished ; that Mullen and Sartori purchased the property on the 10th day of June, 1876; that when Neaman sold…
1Opinion of the CourtThatcher, C. J.
By tbe petition of tbe plaintiff in error, complainant below, it appears that it claims a lien for lumber furnished by it to and used by ISTeaman in the construction of a building situated on a certain lot owned by ISTeaman, in Central City; that tbe lumber, in accordance with a contract between tbe plaintiff in error and ISTea*514man, was delivered to Mm in the month of April, A. D. 1875; that thereafter, and on the 2d day of May, A. D. 1876, before the building was finished, it filed its notice of intention to claim a lien upon the building and premises upon which it was situated, in pursuance…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Cannon & Dounce v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- St. Kevin Mining Co. v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Cannon & Dounce v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890