Legal Opinion

Armstead v. Baldwin

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 20, 2020No. 2:19-cv-04857Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DEMARCO ARMSTEAD, Plaintiff, Civil Action 2:19-cv-4857 v. Judge Sarah D. Morrison Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson B ALDWIN, et al., Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER This matter is before the Undersigned for a screen of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1-2) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). For the following reasons, it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff may, at this time, proceed with the following:  medical deliberate indifference claims;  excessive force claims;  conditions-of-confinement claims;…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API