Legal Opinion

Don Docksteader Motors, Ltd. v. Patal Enterprises, Ltd.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1990No. C-9185PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPEARS, Justice.

This cause presents a challenge to the constitutionality of the Uniform Foreign Country Money-Judgments Recognition Act (“Recognition Act”). Don Docksteader Motors, Ltd. filed suit in a Texas district court to recognize and enforce a judgment rendered by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, ordering Patal Enterprises, Ltd., et al. to pay Docksteader $152,377.01 in Canadian dollars. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Patal. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment on the basis that the Recognition Act was unconstitutional. 776 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Detamore v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Don Docksteader Motors, Ltd. v. Patal Enterprises, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  3. Plastics Engineering Inc. v. Diamond Plastics Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1989

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reading & Bates Construction Co. v. Baker Energy Resources Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  2. Banque Libanaise Pour Le Commerce v. Hanna Elias KhreichCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. La Societe Anonyme Goro v. Conveyor Accessories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Tri-Steel Structures, Inc. v. HackmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. ENRON (THRACE) EXPLORATION v. ClappNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API