Legal Opinion

Lind v. Jones

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1908No. Nos. 15,564—(107)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action in the district court for Roseau county to recover $520.89' for professional services. The case was tried before Grindeland, J.,. and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for the amount demanded. From the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover for services alleged to have been rendered defendants, in which plaintiffs had a verdict upon which judgment was rendered, and defendants Jones and Lawson appealed.

The only question presented by the assignments of error is whether the evidence presented by plaintiffs was sufficient to sustain the claim that they were employed by and rendered services for appellants. A careful reading of the record leads to the conclusion that the verdict, having been approved by the trial court, should not be disturbed.

The services for which recovery is sought were rendered by plaintiffs, if…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Minnesota & Manitoba RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. High v. Supreme Lodge of WorldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API