Legal Opinion

McPherrin v. Jones

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1895PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Walsh County; Templeton, J. Action by George H. McPherrin against Andy Jones. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorliss, J.

The judgment in this case must be reversed for error in the charge of the court. The court instructed the jury as follows: “If you believe that any witness has testified falsely as to any material fact in the case, you have a right to wholly disregard the testimony of such witness, except so far as it is corroborated by other credible evidence in the case, either positive or circumstantial.” This instruction should have been so qualified as to make it applicable only in the event of the jury believing that a witness had willfully or knowingly or intentionally testified falsely. Gold Co. v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Territory of Arizona v. FollettArizona Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Linck v. WhippleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Urlaub v. UrlaubNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Doyle v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Keyes v. BaskervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Richardson v. GageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State v. CampbellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API