Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 6, 1958No. 167PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, J.

The respondent was prosecuted for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. When the case came on for trial in Bennington Municipal Court, difficulty was encountered in drawing a jury. This was because the legislature by No. 51 of the Acts of 1957 had established a new method of impanelling and selecting juries for municipal courts, and in so doing had proceeded to repeal the old one, (See V. S. 47, §1459-60) without allowing sufficient time for the new one to become operative. At the time of the trial, July 18, 1957, a jury list under the new Act was not…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BreanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  2. State v. BrunelleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. State v. PicknellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. State v. BallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  5. State v. FieldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API