Legal Opinion

State v. Jung

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1999No. Court of Appeals No. OT-98-031, Trial Court No. 91-CR-050PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knepper, Judge.

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment of the Ottawa County Court of Common Pleas which ordered the forced administration of antipsychotic medication to appellant, Joseph Jung. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On appeal, appellant sets forth the following assignment of error:

“The Trial Court erred to the prejudice of the Defendant, and contrary to the law of Ohio, in ordering the Defendant to be forced medicated [sic ], based upon the facts presented at hearing.”

On August 19, 1992, appellant was found not guilty by reason' of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In re BurtonOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People Ex Rel. Difanis v. FutiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TannerOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. OrtelloOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. DhimalOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  5. State v. MikhakOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API