Legal Opinion

People v. Jason

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*338Defendant moved for dismissal of the indictment on the ground that he was denied a speedy trial. The statutory six-month period is measured from March 2, 1984, the day on which defendant was arraigned on the original felony complaint (People v Lomax, 50 NY2d 351, 355-356). He was arraigned on a superseding indictment on October 11, 1984. In the intervening 224 days, defendant obtained three adjournments to allow him to testify at Grand Jury proceedings. This period, which accounted for 75 days and brings the total time of delay within the required six months, is chargeable to the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BornholdtNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. People v. LomaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MuhanimacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. ConradAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API