Ross v. Williams Manufacturing Co.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In addition to the foregoing statement of facts, particular attention is called to the 19th paragraph of the petition, which alleges that “petitioner charges that the fire from the lumber plant of said Joe Hadaritz would not have spread to your petitioner’s property, and would not have injured or damaged any of your petitioner’s prop*180erty, except for the lumber piled on your petitioner’s property by defendant’s agents and employees;” and to the fact that the petition further alleges that by reason of said lumber being piled by the defendant on the…