Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided May 27, 1969No. Civ. A. Nos. 11251, 11252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*203ORDER

ALBERT J. HENDERSON, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiffs, landowners in Gwinnett County, Georgia, filed a suit against defendant, a natural gas pipe line company operating in interstate commerce (hereinafter referred to as Transeo), for damages and injunctive relief, alleging that when defendant condemned their lands, pursuant to the power of eminent domain granted by the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717f(h), without first obtaining a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, required by § 717f(e), it trespassed on and damaged their lands. Defendant Transeo responded that it condemned…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Manuel M. Ellis v. Victor Carter, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Illinois Natural Gas Co. v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Ruckle v. Roto American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Colorado-Wyoming Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Natural Gas Co. v. PolandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Harmon v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1982
  3. Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P. v. Stuyvesant Falls Hydro Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API