Legal Opinion

People v. Bellomo

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 1992No. H008504PublishedCited by 8 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CAPACCIOLI, Acting P. J.—

1. Introduction

On October 18, 1989, about 2 p.m., a car co-owned by defendant Samuel Bellomo and his brother Daniel Bellomo ran into two parked cars, pushing one into a third, on a major Santa Clara street. Daniel, in the right front passenger seat, suffered cuts and a bump when his forehead hit and cracked the windshield. Defendant was also in the front seat. After the collision he appeared to be under the influence of a drug.

One of the main issues at trial was whether defendant or a third man was the driver. Defendant was convicted after jury trial of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. AguileraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. State v. DonnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. Duarte CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API