Legal Opinion

McKee v. Cincinnati, Flemingsburg & Southeastern Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 18, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Fleming Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Miller

— Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case; the opinion upon the first appeal may be found in 151 Ky., 698, where the facts are stated somewhat minutely.

The facts shown at the last trial differ in no material respect from those shown upon the first trial. They need not, therefore, be repeated, except to say that McKee was a general laborer for the defendant railroad company, at Flemingsburg, and was injured while coupling the air-brakes between two cars. He had been directed to do that work by Dudley, the defendant’s superintendent; and the question…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Netter's Admr. v. Louisville Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Vance v. HaslettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1815
  3. Pierce v. BushCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1814
  4. McKee v. Cincinnati, Flemingsburg & Southeastern R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brannon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Baker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API