Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Kattaya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 2, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

During claimant’s tenure as a security officer at a museum, he worked both the day shift and the night shift, preferring the latter because he received a pay differential and free parking. Due to disciplinary problems, the employer decided to transfer him to the day shift. Claimant refused to accept the transfer and tendered his resignation. Thereafter,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AdorisioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of SeftelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re the Claim of ShifreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Claim of DiermyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of AriasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Matter of Kupiec (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API