Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1996No. 79410PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMA WILSON, Chief Justice:

The issue is whether the appellant, Continental Casualty Company, violated 42 U.S.C. § 407(a) by seeking a judgment for an alleged overpayment of disability insurance after the appellee, Leslie Hunt, was awarded back benefits from social security based upon disability. We find that the appellant’s actions violated the federal statute.

I. SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1963 appellee 1 acquired a disability-insurance policy. The policy was designed to provide disabled employees with a percentage of their pre-disability income. Hunt was not required to apply…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ervin B. Madden v. Itt Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees Federal Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Hurd v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
  4. Seybold v. Western Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Moore v. ColauttiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. York (In Re York)District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1997
  2. Provident Life and Cas. Co., Inc. v. CreanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Opinion No. (2002), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API