Legal Opinion

Molyneaux v. Amarillo Independent School Dist.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1925No. 2418PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing..The appellants complain in their motion for rehearing that we erred in holding that the Legislature, by the general law quoted in the opinion of this court, could enact a law making the land of appellants liable for the payment of pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the school district without making the law effective only upon the contingency of an election being held to determine whether the citizens and inhabitants and electors of the added territory, or of the whole district, would assume such liability.

We did not so hold in the original opinion rendered in this cause, but,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graham v. City of GreenvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Parker v. Harris County Drainage Dist. No. 2Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Harris v. City of Port ArthurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tilton v. Dayton Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Clark v. Cedar Hill Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Hoya v. Woden Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Strawn Independent School Dist. v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Carlton Independent School Dist. v. JordonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API