Legal Opinion

Melton v. Schwinger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 1996No. 96-1654Published

1Per curiam

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Appellees have moved to dismiss this appeal because of lack of jurisdiction. It is their position that the notice of appeal was untimely filed. The issue turns on whether the motion for new trial was timely served. Appellants admit that on the face of the documents it appears that the notice was filed on the 11th day. They assert, however, that there are three reasons why their notice for new trial was, in fact, timely filed.

First, they contend that since Appel-lees moved to strike their motion as being untimely but the court instead denied it on the merits, a valid order…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. Malden Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API