Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Downing

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided June 16, 2025No. 2:23-cv-06823Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Richard Sanders, Case No. 2:23-cv-06823-RMG-MHC Plaintiff, v. ORDER Detective Matthew Downing, Defendant. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 62) and deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 72). (Dkt. No. 82). Plaintiff filed objections to the R&R (Dkt. No. 86), and Defendant filed a reply (Dkt. No. 87). For the reasons set forth below, the Court adopts the R&R as the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Torres v. New York State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API