Snowden v. United States
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case Nos. 2:18-CR-18-RCJ-GWF 11 Plaintiff, 2:19-CV-552-RCJ 12 vs. ORDER 13 OREN SNOWDEN, 14 Defendant. 15 16 After pleading guilty, Defendant collaterally attacks his conviction and sentence, claiming 17 ineffective assistance of counsel among other arguments. However, Defendant’s contentions 18 cannot overcome the strong presumption of effective assistance, and he waived his other 19 arguments. Thus, the Court denies his motion. 20 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 21 After serving a sentence for a felony…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.