Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark Twain Bank-Kansas City

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1986No. Nos. 84-2370, 84-2482PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In a prior proceeding, we remanded this case to the district court for further findings regarding whether Select Industries, Inc. (Select), acting through its president, *655Arthur Selectman, was a holder in due course of a certain $850,000 cashier’s check. The background of this transaction and the issues before the district court on remand are set forth in our earlier opinion. See United States v. Mark Twain Bank-Kansas City, 771 F.2d 361 (8th Cir.1985). On remand, the district court adhered to its original conclusion that Select was not a holder in due course of the cashier’s check based on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Modine Manufacturing Company v. CarlockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. United States v. Mark Twain Bank-Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States of America v. Mark Twain Bank-Kansas City 2001 Computerized Consultants, Inc. v. United States of America, Tic Federal Credit Union (Tic) and Bergstrom Federal Credit Union of Austin, United States of America v. Mark Twain Bank-Kansas City Arthur B. Selectman, Jr., D/b/a/ a & a Replacement Parts a & a Towing, Perfection Body Shop and Select Industries, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. United States of America, Tic Federal Credit Union (Tic) and Bergstrom Federal Credit Union of AustinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API