Stewart v. Isidor
New York Court of Common Pleas
Motion for leave to put in supplemental answer. This action was brought by Alexander T. Stewart against Siegfried Isidor and Julius Blumenthal, as debtors, and Moritz Isidor, their assignee." The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBarrett, J.
—In the case of Goodwin v. Sharkey, decided on the 17th inst., I held that property which had been conveyed by a bankrupt in fraud of his creditors prior to the passage of the bankrupt law, became vested in the assignee in bankruptcy by the force of that act and by virtue of the proceedings thereunder (Ante, 64).
The question now arises as to the effect of these proceedings upon a judgment creditor’s suit, commenced before the passage of the act, for the purpose of setting aside conveyances alleged to be fraudulent, and of reaching the property transferred thereby.
The facts are these : On the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haxtun v. CorseNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
- Utica Insurance v. PowerNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Roberts v. Albany & West Stockbridge Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1857
- Field v. SandsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1861
- Lowry v. MorrisonNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.