Illinois Surety Co. v. Frankfort Heating Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Clinton Circuit Court; Joseph Combs, Judge. Action by the Frankfort Heating Company against the Illinois Surety Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.
Appellee sued appellant on a surety bond executed by it to insure the performance of a contract entered into by one Schott and appellee, whereby Schott agreed to install the Schott Hydro-Vacuum Heating System in the heating plant of appellee, at Frankfort.
The court overruled a demurrer to the complaint, and sustained a demurrer to the second paragraph of appellant’s answer. The issue was formed by the first paragraph of answer, which was a general denial. The cause was tried by a jury, resulting in a verdict of $2,000 for plaintiff. Prom the judgment rendered on this verdict, appellant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Valparaiso Lighting Co. v. TylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Acme Cycle Co. v. ClarkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Bauer v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Sharples Separator Co. v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
- Suit v. HershmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Livingston v. Reid-Hart Parr Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Advance Oil Co. v. HuntIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.