Legal Opinion

Bolin v. Francis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 14, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Minggold District Court. AotioN to redeem from tax sale. The court dismissed the plaintiff’s petition, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Ch. J.

The plaintiff bases his right to redeem from the tax sale upon the ground that no proper proof of *620the service of the expiration notice was filed with the treasurer. The defendant, while denying that such proof was not filed, pleaded that more than five years had elapsed from the execution and recording of the tax deed before this action was commenced. It is not denied by the plaintiff that such time had elapsed; but his position is that the limitation of five years does not apply to this case. The statute in question is section 902 of the Code, and is as follows: “No action for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trulock v. BentleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. HuberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  2. McCash v. PenrodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Bull v. GilbertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. Woodward v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API