Legal Opinion
Rohm and Haas Co. v. Capuano
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided February 3, 2004No. 02-521SPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SMITH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Rohm and Haas Company (“Rohm and Haas” or “Plaintiff’) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Rohm and Haas initiated this action against the following Defendants: Daniel J. Capuano, Jr. and Jack C. Capuano (the “Capuanos”); the Daniel J. Capuano, Jr. Trust, the Daniel J. Capuano, Jr. Property Trust, the Jack C. Capuano Trust and the Jack C. Capuano Property Trust (the “Trusts”), of which the Capuanos are the trustees; Capuano Associates, a Rhode Island partnership in which Daniel Capuano,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- William R. Gooley v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Aybar v. Crispin-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Mack v. NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Anthony v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Lee v. MorinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Dfs Secured Healthcare Receivables Trust v. Caregivers Great Lakes, Inc. And Marc LeestmaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Warne Investments, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Gatx Corp. v. AddingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012
- Bondi v. Grant Thornton InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.