Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Parsons

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 2000No. 23042PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES K. PREWITT, Judge.

Appellant Harlow Dean Parsons appeals from a judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage. He contends the trial court erred in not changing the name of the parties’ child.

Petitioner-Respondent (Wife) gave birth to a son, Michael Edward Hayes on October 11, 1992, in Kansas. The father of the child is Respondent-Appellant (Husband). Although the two were not married at the time of the child’s birth, paternity of the child is not an issue here. When Michael was born, Wife named the child using her surname, and left blank the designation for the father’s name. She testified…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of NataleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. D.R.H. v. W.H.P.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. R.K.-T.S. ex rel. V.T. v. R.S.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Superior Outdoor Advertising Co. v. SnadonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Barr v. BarrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stacy v. Department of Social Services, Division of Medical ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. In re to Change Name of Tia'i MaseHigh Court of American Samoa · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API