Legal Opinion

Moore v. Moore

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 22, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On motion to dismiss plea as slaam and frivolous.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, V. C.

On May 8th, 1908, the bill of complaint was filed in this cause. The complainants named in the bill are William Moore and Susan Moore, his wife, Mary Hagens and Mathew Hagens, her husband, Margaret Philis and James Philis, her husband, and Anna A. Jamieson. The suit is one for partition. On June 24-th, 1908, the defendants filed a plea to the bill, which sets up that at the time the complainants exhibited the bill against the defendants the complainant Margaret Philis was an infant under the age of twenty-one years, to wit, twenty years, and exhibited the bill without having a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mackey v. MackeyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Caruso v. CarusoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. Erie R. Co. v. FritschCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  3. South Camden Trust Co. v. StiefelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  4. Drumm v. PavlickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API