Legal Opinion
Stephen Tancredi and Ronald Speidel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York Stock Company and Metlife, Inc., a Delaware Holding Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 21, 2003No. Docket 01-7888PublishedCited by 160 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Stephen Tancredi and Ronald Speidel appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Lewis A. Kap-lan, Judge, dismissing their claims, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), that the conversion of defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) from a mutual to a stock life insurance company in accordance with New York Insurance Law, see N.Y. Ins. Law § 7312 (McKinney 2000), violated their rights under the Takings Clause, the Contracts Clause, the Due Process Clause, and the Commerce Clause of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- Fabrikant v. FrenchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Sybalski v. Independent Group Home Living Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Stephen Tancredi and Ronald Speidel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York Stock Company, and Metlife, Inc., a Delaware Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Rzayeva v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Anilao v. SpotaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.