Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gray v. Starbird Landscape Nursery

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 26, 1966No. 35606Published

1DissentDrew, Justice

The order of the deputy on this claim contains no finding of fact and no reference to the facts in evidence apart from the conclusion that claimant was excluded from compensation coverage because she “was engaged in agricultural farm labor on the farm of the employer, Starbird Landscape Nursery, and was at said time employed by Starbird Landscape Nursery, who was at said time a bona fide farmer.”

Under our law and decisions I am unable to review the propriety of the Commission’s affirmance of this conclusion in an order totally devoid of substantiating factual findings.1 I would reverse and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hammersla v. PriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API