Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
The employer, appellant, argues that the award of double compensation should not be confirmed for the following reasons: (1) Liability for double compensation where a minor is employed without a permit is predicated on the negligence of the employer; (2) double compensation should be imposed only where failure to have a child-labor permit is a cause in fact of the injury; and (3) double compensation should not be imposed where a minor assumes the risk of working without a permit.
None of the above contentions is sound. The statutes require the imposition of double compensation under the facts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brenner v. HerubenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Milwaukee News Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Bloomer Brewery, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- D.L. Ex Rel. Friederichs v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Boardman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Garnhum's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Beard v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Beard v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999