Legal Opinion

Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The employer, appellant, argues that the award of double compensation should not be confirmed for the following reasons: (1) Liability for double compensation where a minor is employed without a permit is predicated on the negligence of the employer; (2) double compensation should be imposed only where failure to have a child-labor permit is a cause in fact of the injury; and (3) double compensation should not be imposed where a minor assumes the risk of working without a permit.

None of the above contentions is sound. The statutes require the imposition of double compensation under the facts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brenner v. HerubenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Milwaukee News Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bloomer Brewery, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. D.L. Ex Rel. Friederichs v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Boardman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Garnhum's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  4. Beard v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Beard v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API