Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Meyer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2012No. 2012-1001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Rebecca Christine Meyer, f.k.a. Gee, 1 Attorney Registration No. 0076007, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2003. She was also admitted to the practice of law in Kentucky. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline now recommends that we suspend Meyer from the practice of law for 18 months, with six months stayed on a condition. We adopt the board’s recommended sanction.

Background

{¶ 2} On December 17, 2010, the Supreme Court suspended Meyer from the practice of law and sanctioned her in the amount of $750 pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(5)(A)(1) and (4)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. HigginsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. CrandallOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N v. GeeKentucky Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Derryberry.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. KaiserOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. KaiserOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API