Wilson v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentFletcher, Chief Justice
Even without a showing of prejudice, the majority opinion will require the reversal of any bench trial in which the trial judge denied a party’s request to present closing argument. Although the rule is clear in Georgia that parties have an absolute right to closing argument in a jury trial,1 there is no justifiable reason to extend that rule to bench trials. Because there is no evidence that the trial judge’s decision not to hear closing arguments in this case harmed either of the parties, there is no need to reverse the entire case. Accordingly, I dissent.
The majority cites no Georgia case…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oil Workers International Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Madison v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Vandyke v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Early & Lane v. Oliver & NortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Barnes v. BenhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.