Legal Opinion

State v. Hynes

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 5, 2009No. 2008-371Published

1Opinion of the Court

978 A.2d 264 (2009)

The STATE of New Hampshire

v.

Daniel P. HYNES.

No. 2008-371.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Argued: March 12, 2009.

Opinion Issued: August 5, 2009.

Kelly A. Ayotte, attorney general (Elizabeth J. Baker, assistant attorney general, on the brief and orally), for the State.

Christopher M. Johnson, chief appellate defender, of Concord, on the brief and orally, for the defendant.

HICKS, J.

The defendant, Daniel P. Hynes, appeals his conviction after a jury trial in Superior Court (Barry, J.) of one count of theft by extortion. See RSA 637:5, II(i) (2007). We affirm.

I. Background

The jury…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API