Brown v. Garman
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLE, Justice.
This interlocutory appeal presents the threshold jurisdictional question whether federal labor relations laws preempt damage claims asserted by a union member against union officials for (1) intentional infliction of emotional distress, and (2) intentional interference with contractual relations and employment opportunities. The district court dismissed both claims on the ground that the preemption doctrine deprives the state court of jurisdiction to decide them. We conclude that federal law preempts only the claim of interference with contractual and employment opportunities,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thompto v. Coborn's Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
- Barske v. Rockwell International Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Weise v. Washington Tru Solutions, L.L.C.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008